MAHA is a public health advocacy initiative that uses petitions and campaigns to push government action on environmental and health issues.
Change.org is an online platform that enables people to create and sign petitions, mobilising public support to influence governments, organisations, and corporations.
An international activist network focusing on global issues like climate change and human rights.
Provides tools for users to create grassroots campaigns, including petitions and fundraising efforts.
A progressive advocacy group in the USA that offers petition tools as part of its broader campaign strategies.

Petitioning played a major role in early American political life, including campaigns to abolish slavery. In the 19th century, petitions were routinely submitted to Congress, read into the record, and referred to committees.
The US Constitution protects the right to petition the government, but there is no single national system that guarantees a response. Instead, several decentralised mechanisms allow citizens to influence law and policy directly:
These tools make the US system highly decentralised: petitions have no guaranteed federal impact, but at state and agency levels they can directly shape outcomes.
Third-party platforms (e.g., Change.org – see above) remain popular, though these carry no formal obligation for government response. New initiatives such as MAHA and DOGE have been added by the Trump administration.

As early as the 13th century, subjects petitioned the monarch for redress of grievances. By the 17th century, the right to petition Parliament was affirmed—most notably in 1669, when the House of Commons declared it an inherent right of every commoner in England to prepare and present petitions in case of grievance. The 18th and 19th centuries saw widespread political mobilisation through petitions, such as those advocating the abolition of slavery or electoral reform.
Since 2015, the UK Parliament has hosted an official e-petitions platform: petition.parliament.uk. It allows UK residents and citizens to create and sign petitions online. The process is managed by the Petitions Committee, composed of MPs, who determine the official response or whether to recommend the petition for debate.
Reaching the thresholds does not guarantee legislative change, but it ensures formal recognition and the possibility of further scrutiny.
The influence of petitions varies. Their primary value lies in visibility and transparency, acting as a pressure point. Usually action is only taken if the petition is easy for government. For e.g., (true story) it created debates on the puppy market and a change of legislation on this. Lots of petitions are pointless / misdirected. E.g. largest current petition is a request for a general election – something the government obviously aren’t going to do.
Petitions are valuable tools for raising awareness and mobilising public interest. They give people an accessible way to express opinion, demonstrate scale of concern, and push issues into public view. Large petitions, such as those against government digital IDs, show the strength and spread of sentiment across the country.
However, governments often treat petitions as advisory rather than binding. Even when thresholds are met and debates are held, official responses are frequently formulaic or dismissive. In practice, many petitions are noted, discussed briefly, and then quietly set aside.
Therefore, petitions should be seen as one element of a wider campaign. They are effective for visibility, education, and pressure, but real change requires coordinated follow-up: lobbying, media engagement, legal challenges, and sustained political organisation.